ion.
     3. We would like any other artificial delays in our case  proceeding to
be stopped. We also have right to know who is in charge of our
     file!
     4. If we will not be given the status of landed immigrants immediately,
Immigration officials will completely destroy us.
     5. A criminal  investigation must be initiated  on the manipulation  of
the medical data.


     Demands in Elisabetha GUNIN (Epstein) case:

     There is only one demand: she must be given her landed immigrant papers
immediately and unconditionally.

     Yours truly,
     Lev GUNIN November 14 2000 Montreal






UPDATE IN FAMILY GUNIN SITUATION


UPDATE IN FAMILY GUNIN PERSECUTIONS


     Manipulation  of  medical data for political persecutions is the end of
the civilized society
     - December 2000 -


C O N T E N T

     1. Short descriptions of events - end of 1999 - beginning of 2000
     2. Lev GUNIN - "The Source Of Our Problems"
     2. List of documents
     3. The whole immigration story
     4. Other English publications on  Internet  about persecution of family
GUNIN
     To Human Rights Organizations
     (AI, HRW, UNHRC, etc.)

     December, 2000. Montreal, QUEBEC

     - DOCUMENT NUMBER FOUR-A -

     From        Lev        GUNIN       Full        immigration       story:
http://www.total.net/~leog/Righs/LevGunin/indexX.htm
     former refugee claimant
     (address, tel. 514-49-1294, leog@total,net) December 6 2000

     Dear Sir or Lady!

     The  most unpleasant  thing  is  that  in  a  country  where  there  no
concentration camps and common tortures nobody believes you.
     Nobody believes  that what happens  to  you -  happens. That's why it's
even harder to stand our troubles.

     1.  Let  me  mention  briefly  the source  of  our  problems: I  was  a
human-rights activist, former Soviet dissident (which led to deportation
     from  my native  Belarus to  Poland). From there my  family and  I were
taken against our will to Israel. In Canada we filed a refugee
     claim. Since 1994 we do not have normal life. We have problems.

     Usage (against us) of contrived medical  data to manipulate and prolong
our vulnerable situation is one of them.
     Theoretically falsification and manipulation  of medical  data can lead
to a forcible treatment from diseases, which
     we do not have (it could be lethal).

     2. Now we are more then 6  years in a limbo, administrative  mayhem and
ultra-vulnerable state.
     However, in spite of human rights deniers in IRB and other departments,
pro-Israeli lobby (with their people in Immigration), personal
     contribution of  Immigration  officer  Mrs. Udith Malka in damaging our
situation, we received a positive decision. (In response to our
     humanitarian appeal  1+ (one+) year ago).  Since then opponents to this
decision made many attempts to reverse it and make our life
     unbearable. We are still without any status, facing excessive hardship.
     (a). Even at routine immigration procedures we are a target of mockery,
stalling tactics and humiliation (see Document 8).
     (b).  Unnecessary   personal   expensive  medical  exams   and  blatant
manipulation of medical data (Doc. 1-23), delays in issuing and
     short terms  of  validity of  employment  and  student  authorizations,
punitive and threatening anonymous calls and letters (Doc. 1-6,
     specifically - 16). Excessive "totalitarian" secrecy and anonymity when
Immigration is dealing with us (Doc. 10a, 13a, 1, 14, 15, etc.)
     (c).  After two  (2) years  we have no clear  answer  about  our police
certificate clearance in spite of confirmation from the Israeli
     Consulate.
     (d). More  than half a year  ago  IMS officials refused  us ruling  and
forms for medical examination for all family members assuring us
     that  only my wife must do them. Now in contradiction they ordered them
for my younger daughter and me (omitting my older
     daughter). When the last medical exams must  finish, the validity of my
wife's exams will expire (Doc. 2, 19, 20). Also my mother's file
     was illegally attached to ours to put us in dependence of her situation
(Doc. 1, 4, 6).
     (e). My mother's case. 1994: W. Brzezinska, M.D. for Immigration, makes
an insincere report (Doc. 7a, 4b, 7b) about my mother's
     health (eventual (!) development of cardiac and  kidney insufficiency).
(My mother told her that she was born with heart
     augmentation). Nov. 1999: an immigration officer (M-me Roy), not a M.D.
illegally intervenes in evaluation of the medical matters,
     makes  a decision  based  on  it (Doc.  7a,7b).  However,  she  quickly
replaces that decision - recognizing my mother's marriage. In
     violation of  the marriage  interview stage  requirements IMS release a
negative decision before med. exams (Doc. 7a). 2000: an entire
     year of mockery, ungrounded orders for innumerable additional tests and
exams, punitive threatening letters and calls. Goals: a) to
     damage my mother's heath, b) clear dr. Brzezinska and M-me Roy (Doc. 14
-17). For two months after her "medical saga"
     Immigration was refusing to give any answer/explanation. Now (Dec.) IMS
made a final negative ruling, based on Mrs. Bezezinska's
     insinuation  in spite of new  contradicting to  it results  and medical
opinions (anatomy, not pathology). (Also dr. Brzezinska never in 5
     years   sent  my  mother  for   cardiac   or  kidney   tests,   or   to
cardiologist/urologist, and never prescribed her any medication for
     heart/kidney  problems). It  is outraged that  the whole year  IMS  was
evaluating not actual but eventual health problems - and
     confirmed  initial  inhuman  decision!  (Doc.   25).  If  the  horrible
diagnosis (Doc. 25a), with which they crucified my mother, were correct,
     how could  she live a normal life all 6  years without medications  and
cardiologist? If my mother's heath declined after one year of
     humiliations -  Immigration officials  must  be  fully  responsible for
that. This is what they did it to punish me!

     Actions  to  influence   or  even   administratively   invade   medical
institutions and personnel for extorting false medical reports, creation of
     false  medical  documents  were committed  in both  my mother's  and my
cases. Tricks with my x-ray, delivery of receipts or calls for
     tests I've never done, other  manipulations are threat  to my own heath
or even life! (Doc. 1-7, 9-25). Our children are tremendously
     suffering  from  that situation  as well as from artificial  delays  in
extension of their student authorizations and other essential papers.
     My  wife  and my  mother  became suicidal,  nervous and  suffering from
depression.
     I never received any answer to my letter to the Minister of Immigration
(Nov. 1-6 2000) and to Immigration Complain Board (Nov. 30).

     4.  In spite of persecutions we have contributed to Canadian society as
much as we could. We had no conflicts in civil life. We
     worked. We have accommodated in spite of artificial obstacles -  thanks
to ordinary Canadians. Even in Federal Immigration some
     people  tried to compensate  the damage, done to us  by others. I  have
participated in tenth of musical festivals and events. My wife is
     a hard  worker.  Our  children  are recognized  talented  musician  and
ballerina (OTHER PUBLICATIONS

     http://www.interlog.com/~syedma/dstand/leo201127.html
     http://www.interlog.com/~syedma/dstand/leo_updte02.html
     http://www.amin.org/update/censor.htm
     http://www.singer.ca/forum/imm/messages/821.html
     http://www.kuero4/justice/gun.html




UPDATE IN FAMILY GUNIN SITUATION
     UPDATE IN FAMILY GUNIN PERSECUTIONS
     Manipulation of medical data  for political persecutions is the end  of
the civilized society
     - December 2000 -


C O N T E N T
     1. List of documents
     2. Complaint on Immigration actions and decisions
     3. Complaint against refusal to allow medical examinations.
     4. Disagreement with  the decision of  Imm.Med.Serv. from  November 23,
2000.
     5. Copy of a complaint made to Montreal Chest Institute.
     6. Short descriptions of events - end of 1999 - beginning of 2000
     7. Lev GUNIN - "The Source Of Our Problems"
     8. Wider detailed  description  of events before December (Sept. - Nov.
2000)
     9. Resume of the visit to MCI December 4 2000.
     10. The whole immigration story
     11. Other  English publications on Internet about persecution of family
GUNIN
     To Human Rights Organizations
     (AI, HRW, UNHRC, etc.)

     December, 2000. Montreal, QUEBEC

     - Introductory Document -


     From       Lev        GUNIN        Full        immigration       story:
{www.total.net/~leog/Righs/LevGunin/indexX.htm}
     former refugee claimant
     (tel. 514-49-1294) December 2 2000

     Introductory Note
     1.  Because violations and  injustice are so  outraged and unbelievable
that it is difficult to speak
     about  them  without  emotions,  I  decided  not  to  write  a  special
description of events. Instead I
     am  handing  you  over  a number  of  documents, which  will  speak for
themselves.
     2.  Below I am listing  these documents  with comments and explanations
about each.
     Manipulation and  falsification of  medical data is  the most dangerous
and tremendous violation
     of human rights. Most letters from Immigration were anonymous, but only
few marked here on
     that regard as examples.

     Document 1:
     Complaint on Immigration actions and decisions submitted to Immigration
Complain Board
     (like  attempts  to  cause damage  to  victim's  heath).  Theoretically
falsification and blatant
     manipulation  of medical  data  can lead to a  forcible treatment  from
diseases, which one do not
     have (it could be lethal).
     Document 2:
     Complaint  against  refusal  to  allow  all  my family  members medical
examinations.
     Document 3:
     My disagreement with  the decision of Imm.Med.Serv.  from  November 23,
2000.
     Document 4-a:
     A  shortened  description  of events, which  manifested abuse of power,
ungrounded secrecy,
     misconduct and criminal manipulation of medical data. Document 4-b is a
supplementary
     description  about  the source  of  my  problems.  It  is  crucial  for
understanding the mechanism
     behind the persecutions.
     Document 5:
     Fifth is a copy of a complaint made to Montreal Chest Institute.
     Document 6:
     A  wider description of  events,  with  more astonishing  and  outraged
details. This document is
     not        enclosed        but       available       on       Internet:
{www.interlog.com/~syedma/dstand/leo201127.html}
     Document 7a, 7b, 7c, 7d:
     M-me  Roy's  rulings:  illegal  intervention  into medical  matters  by
non-medic, violation of the
     procedural requirements of  the  marriage interview  stage, prejudicial
ruling of IMS before my
     mother's medical exams for the landed immigrant status.
     Document 8:
     Complaint to Immigration about extension's of  employment authorization
sabotage from May
     15 2000.
     Document 9:
     Resume of my visit to MCI December 4 2000.
     Document 10-a
     The anonymous letter from MCI mentioned in Documents 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6.
Document 10-b:
     another  letter (one page)  demanding a donation to  the Royal Victoria
Hospital was included in
     the same envelope as the "TB letter".
     Document 11
     An order-receipt (payment)  to  pay  for  the blood test  for syphilis,
which was never done.
     Another document  (Document 12)  shows  that  dr. Giannalis  uses  this
laboratory to evaluate
     test samples, taken at his office. The  blood test for syphilis was not
required by Immigration in
     my case. It was also mentioned that a patient must only appear for this
test in the CDL
     Laboratories,  in  other words  samples  taken outside CDL Lab  are not
admitting for evaluation
     for syphilis.
     Document 12
     Strum creatinine test's form from CDL  Lab form for my mother. The test
was ordered by dr.
     Giannakis on Immigration's request and the result was: in norm.
     Document 13-a
     Front page of  the  IMS  ruling from November 23  letter  (received  on
November 28).
     Corresponds to  Document  3. Also was mentioned in  Documents  1, 4, 6.
Document 13-b is the
     text  of  the internal  part of  the same  ruling,  addressing  to  dr.
Giannakis.
     Document 14-a
     Ruling from IMS to my mother,  Elisabetha Epstein from January 17 2000.
This document is
     anonymous, no names, telephone  numbers. Document 14-b is  the  text of
the internal part of
     the same ruling, addressing to dr. Giannakis.
     Document 15-a
     Ruling from  IMS to my  mother, Elisabetha  Epstein  from June 30 2000.
This document is
     anonymous, no names, telephone numbers.  Document  15-b is  the text of
the internal part of
     the same ruling, addressing to dr. Giannakis.
     Document 15 plus
     September 2000 - letter from IMS ordering another urine test and then a
visit to an urologist.
     Document 16
     An  offensive  letter from my  mother's  new immigration  officer  from
September 18 2000.
     Document 17
     My mother's, Elisabetha  Epstein,  response (September  20 2000)  to an
offensive letter from
     Immigration (see Document 16).
     Document 18
     Copy of the positive response to our humanitarian appeal
     Document 19
     An order from  January 11 2000 to my wife, Alla, to undergo the medical
examination. Only my
     wife's  name mentioned  in  this  letter.  This letter is  a proof that
refusing to include all family
     members Immigration stalling the completion of our file almost one year
now.
     Document 20
     An order from October  26 2000 to me and  my daughter Marta  to undergo
medical
     examination.  Was  submitted   in  contradiction   with  the   previous
Immigration's assurance that
     only my wife has to undergo medical examination.
     Document 21-a
     X-ray  result from Le Centre Radiologique Clarke from November 14 2000,
which tremendously
     contradict the Immigration's x-ray from November 01 2000 evaluation. In
response to TB
     double-check request (see Document 21-b) it said "NIL ACTIVE". The film
was evaluated by 3
     medical doctors, which came  to the same "nil active" conclusion. I was
seen and evaluated by
     2  medical  doctors  since  October  29,  who  found the  TB  suspicion
ridiculous.
     Document 22
     X-ray result  from  November  22 1994 from the Centre Hospitalier Reddy
Memorial. On request
     of W. Brzezinska, M.D. if  there is recent pulmonary infiltrate it said
"no recent pulmonary
     infiltrate shown".
     Document 23
     Mr. Z. JAST's  certificate  for Immigration  in  relation to  the x-ray
dispute.
     Document 24
     Internet-links   to   two   publications,   which    might   accelerate
persecutions.
     Document 25-a,b
     IMS final decision in my mother's case from Dec. 5 2000.
     Document 26
     Document 27
     List  of  "civil"  events.  Relates to  our  will to contribute to  the
society.
     Lev GUNIN December 2 2000 Montreal




COPY - DOCUMENT NUMBER ONE -
     To Immigration's Canada Complaint Board
     (faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237) November 30 2000
     From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)

     This is the complaint on actions and decisions, which my advisers and I
found inadmissible, like
     attempts to  cause  damage to my  mother's and my heath.  Theoretically
falsification and blatant
     manipulation of  medical  data can  lead to  a forcible  treatment from
diseases, which one do not
     have (it could be lethal).
     .
     I submit  you 5 documents. The First is this one. Second is a complaint
against refusal to allow
     all my family members medical examinations half a year ago. Third is my
disagreement with the
     decision of Immigration  Health Services from November 23, 2000. Fourth
is a shortened
     description  of events,  which manifested  abuse  of  power, ungrounded
secrecy, misconduct and
     criminal manipulation of medical  data.  Fifth is a copy of a complaint
made to Montreal Chest
     Institute.  Sixth  is  a   wider  description  of  events,  with   more
astonishing and outraged details.
     However, because  of the length of the Sixth document its submission by
fax could be found
     offensive, so, please, tell me where to send it by post or e-mail.

     I would like to know:
     A)  Who  made  all  mentioned in six documents unjust decisions (names,
position, what their role
     in my file).
     B) On what ground (law, paragraph, circumstances).
     C)  Who made a decision,  based on a single  x-ray: to  consider  me  a
potential TB carrier and
     submitted  it  not to Mr. Giannakis,  M.D.  but to  the Royal  Victoria
Hospital, depriving me and
     doctor  Giannakis  of a  minimal  choice to choose where  to  turn  for
further evaluation. Is the MCI
     radiology unit a part of IMS (ImmMedSrv)?
     D)  If the x-ray film (made at MCI)  could be obtained for copying.  My
legal advisers and me - we
     want to ask  you to show it to us at 1010 St Antoine, Montreal. We want
to check:
     E) If a)  there is  any technical defect or underwear shadow, which was
offensively interpreted
     as  "TB" b)  this  x-ray matches my  body constitution c) an  obviously
normal result was blatantly
     interpreted  as  "abnormal". We would like to be  given a permission to
take this film or its copy to
     medical specialists to determine it.
     F) How  all  contradictions,  deceptions,  violations can  be explained
(each event).
     G)  Examples: a) Half  a year ago IMS  officials refused  to  submit us
ruling and forms for medical
     examination for all family members assuring us that only my wife has to
go through them. Now
     in  contradiction with what  was  said before they ordered  my  younger
daughter and me (now
     omitting my older daughter) to do examinations. B) Why my mother's file
was illegally attached
     to mine. c)  How could so many ungrounded medical tests be ruled for my
mother, keeping her
     more then one year (!) in limbo, etc.
     H) How all such decisions might be appealed?
     I) Has my mother and me same IMS agents or agents of the same unit? Who
are supervisors
     of  all agents, attached to our  files  (including Immigration  Medical
Services - IMS).
     J) How to reach them?
     K) If Immigration's agents (IMS included) are subjects of Criminal Code
- or they are
     completely uncontrolled and impunitive.
     L) If they are not (impunitive) what is the way to complain about
     1.  Deliberate  damage  of  my  (my family's)  financial,  social,  and
psychological situation.
     2. Criminal manipulation of the medical data
     M) How could  I  know if W. Brzezinska's M.D.  rapport with a "concern"
about my health
     presents not only in my mother's but in my file as well?
     N) Why my file is proceeding not  on Montreal -  as  normally - but  in
Ottawa?

     I must  warn you  that I will  contact police or RCMP in  case  of  any
further anonymous calls
     ("private  call"  indication)  from Immigration and  will disregard any
letters, until they will not be
     signed and carry  the  name and phone  number  of  the  person  who  is
responsible for the
     decision. All  anonymous telephone calls, which accuse me of concealing
a number of
     infectious